Duration 41:12
Eachine Airloader Long Range FPV Aircraft Comprehensive Review
Published 3 Oct 2020
In this most detailed and comprehensive review of Eachine Airloader I will cover all the features, and design considerations of this awesome Long Range FPV RC airplane. This is a 40+ minutes long video so watch it all the way to fully benefit from this detailed video and learn all about Eachine airloader, its coolest new features and its special considerations behind its design elements. Watch Flight video here: /watch/UvILJTV0Hqz0L Like my Work, Buy Me a Coffee: https://bit.ly/alicoffee Our Online Services: https://bit.ly/asmservices Join Our Mailing List: https://bit.ly/alishanmaoml Join Channel: https://bit.ly/joinalishanmaoyt My 3D models: http://bit.ly/2H3pxDH My Social Media: http://alishanmao.bio.link New RC Helicopters: https://bit.ly/3Vn2CbI Best RC Helicopters: FW450 V3: http://bit.ly/3YT8qeF Airwolf Shell: https://bit.ly/3kinLXt Huey UH-1: https://bit.ly/3ugxzT2 Bell 206: https://bit.ly/3HCnVl4 Black hawk UH60: https://bit.ly/3TmnyxC Sea Hawk: https://bit.ly/3G1KmQx Helicopters Spare Parts: Huey UH-1: http://bit.ly/3SpmfPB FW450L: http://bit.ly/3m4GOVm F09S Seahawk: http://bit.ly/3lYgAUD Bell 206: http://bit.ly/3INPDw0 FW200: http://bit.ly/3xPcAZn My YouTube Channels: AliShanMao Channel: http://tiny.cc/alishanmaoyt Gaming Channel: http://tiny.cc/5s78tz DIY Woodworking TV: http://tiny.cc/b4bbtz Disclaimer: The links to products provided in my video descriptions are my affiliate links. If you order products using those links, there will be no price increase, but I will receive a certain commission on each sales from those links in this description. This commission income supports my family and help me continue to run and manage my youtube channel. #eachine #airloader #FPV #longrangefpv #rcplane #Technology #gadgets #things #flying #air #aviation
Category
Show more
Related videos for Eachine Airloader Long Range FPV Aircraft Comprehensive Review:
!['Midsommar' [Ambient Piano & Strings CC-BY] - Scott Buckley](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OtKgkuWL3ao/mqdefault.jpg)
I specify that it is not an attack but a set of reflection which this want constructive. Regarding the set of rear (rudder and elevator) the simplest to have air flow less disturbed by the fuselage will have adopted a V-tail configuration. in addition there will be weight gain. And above all a gain in drag. For the efficiency of the ailerons at low speed, a possible solution is the system used on the "Optera" flying wing with very fine "winglets" molded in the foam, positioned a few centimeters in front of the aileron attack which allows to hang up the wings. air streams without the loss of substantation and an increase in drag due to a slot connecting the lower surface and upper surface. The same "winglet" system can be adopted on the attack of the wing on the upper surface to again increase the efficiency of the profile at low speed. This reduces the stall speed and also the takeoff distance. I think that this type of "winglet" system will also have avoided weakening the wing / eleron connection by a slot
I apologize for my English but I am French and I use an automatic translator so sorry ... 2
I specify that it is not an attack but a set of reflection which this want constructive. Regarding the set of rear (rudder and elevator) the simplest to have air flow less disturbed by the fuselage will have adopted a V-tail configuration. in addition there will be weight gain. And above all a gain in drag. For the efficiency of the ailerons at low speed, a possible solution is the system used on the "Optera" flying wing with very fine "winglets" molded in the foam, positioned a few centimeters in front of the aileron attack which allows to hang up the wings. air streams without the loss of substantation and an increase in drag due to a slot connecting the lower surface and upper surface. The same "winglet" system can be adopted on the attack of the wing on the upper surface to again increase the efficiency of the profile at low speed. This reduces the stall speed and also the takeoff distance. I think that this type of "winglet" system will also have avoided weakening the wing / eleron connection by a slot
I apologize for my English but I am French and I use an automatic translator so sorry ... 2
I specify that it is not an attack but a set of reflection which this want constructive. Regarding the set of rear (rudder and elevator) the simplest to have air flow less disturbed by the fuselage will have adopted a V-tail configuration. in addition there will be weight gain. And above all a gain in drag. For the efficiency of the ailerons at low speed, a possible solution is the system used on the "Optera" flying wing with very fine "winglets" molded in the foam, positioned a few centimeters in front of the aileron attack which allows to hang up the wings. air streams without the loss of substantation and an increase in drag due to a slot connecting the lower surface and upper surface. The same "winglet" system can be adopted on the attack of the wing on the upper surface to again increase the efficiency of the profile at low speed. This reduces the stall speed and also the takeoff distance. I think that this type of "winglet" system will also have avoided weakening the wing / eleron connection by a slot
I apologize for my English but I am French and I use an automatic translator so sorry ... 2
I specify that it is not an attack but a set of reflection which this want constructive. Regarding the set of rear (rudder and elevator) the simplest to have air flow less disturbed by the fuselage will have adopted a V-tail configuration. in addition there will be weight gain. And above all a gain in drag. For the efficiency of the ailerons at low speed, a possible solution is the system used on the "Optera" flying wing with very fine "winglets" molded in the foam, positioned a few centimeters in front of the aileron attack which allows to hang up the wings. air streams without the loss of substantation and an increase in drag due to a slot connecting the lower surface and upper surface. The same "winglet" system can be adopted on the attack of the wing on the upper surface to again increase the efficiency of the profile at low speed. This reduces the stall speed and also the takeoff distance. I think that this type of "winglet" system will also have avoided weakening the wing / eleron connection by a slot
I apologize for my English but I am French and I use an automatic translator so sorry ... 2